The Hunger That Isn’t for Sex

What the Research Actually Shows

Begin with the fact that settles the shame, because most women carry this quietly, half-convinced that wanting to be held is childish. It is not. In a wide review of the research, affectionate touch — a hand held, an arm around the shoulders, a long hug — emerges as a true human need with measurable effects: it lowers stress, steadies mood, and supports physical health, and its absence carries real costs (Jakubiak & Feeney, 2017). Researchers even have a plain name for going without it — touch starvation, or skin hunger. So the ache you feel is not you being too much. It is a body reporting, accurately, that something it needs has gone missing.

The second finding shows just how deep touch reaches, and it was measured in married women specifically. In a brain-imaging study, women were told to expect a mild electric shock while they lay in the scanner. When they held their husband’s hand, the brain’s alarm circuitry — the regions that light up under threat — quieted noticeably. A stranger’s hand helped a little; the husband’s hand helped far more. And the calming was strongest in the women who rated their marriages as warmest (Coan et al., 2006). Read that again, because it reframes everything: your partner’s touch is not a nicety on top of the relationship. It is a way your nervous system borrows steadiness from another person. When it goes, you don’t just lose affection — you lose a regulator.

The third finding points the way back, and it is gentler than you might fear. In a study where couples logged their days, ordinary touch — not sex, just the passing contact of a hand, a shoulder, a hug in the kitchen — raised the other partner’s mood, and it did so through the sense of intimacy the touch created. More than that: the people who were touched more during the study reported better well-being six months later (Debrot et al., 2013). The repair, in other words, is not a dramatic reunion. It is small, everyday, and cumulative — the same modest contact that quietly went missing, deliberately let back in.

What Perukua Says About Touch

Perukua — the Australian vocalist and women’s facilitator whose work with women has reached more than 63 countries — would recognise this ache immediately, and she would not reduce it to the bedroom. For her, touch is a language of presence, and the trouble in most couples is that the language has gone rough or gone silent. She teaches a form of contact she calls touch with no goal: “touch without any sexual undertone and without expectations — only feeling, only tuning into one another.” That single phrase names what has usually been lost — not sex, but touch that isn’t asking for anything.

She is clear about what such touch is for. These practices, she says, help you “feel your partner not as a function, but as a living being” with an energy of their own — which is exactly what a long marriage erodes, as two people become logistics to each other, a co-manager of the house and the calendar. Her antidote is small and physical. “Sit facing each other, close your eyes, and breathe in one rhythm,” she suggests; “without words. This restores the connection between the body and the heartbeat.” Before any conversation about intimacy, she would put two people back in the same quiet air, breathing.

She is also honest about why a woman withdraws from touch, and it is not coldness. In her women’s course she describes what happens when contact is hurried or demanding: “when we relate to another, we need attunement, we need touch, we need merging. If it is rough, if it is hurried… we cannot open and relax” (women’s course teaching). If, for years, a hand on your back has meant only one thing, your body learns to brace instead of soften. The fix is not to try harder to want; it is to make touch safe and slow again, so the body has a reason to open. And it begins, she insists, at home in your own skin — “we, as women, are created with a very sensitive body,” and reclaiming that sensitivity for yourself is where the return to closeness begins.

Her morning ritual is the smallest possible version of all this, and it costs nothing. On waking, before the phone, “breathe, place your hands on your body and say: hello, I love you.” Then, she says, “embrace your partner and share the warmth and joy of the morning” — with no expectation of where it leads. A walk counts too: “give yourself the space to breathe, to hold hands, to be silent together.” None of it is grand. All of it is the ordinary, goal-free contact the research says a body is starved for.

Why It Fades — and How It Comes Back

It helps to understand why touch drains out of a good marriage, because the usual story — we’ve grown apart, the spark died — is rarely the real one. More often, touch didn’t die; it got collapsed into a single meaning. Early on, couples touch constantly and for no reason: a hand on the neck, a lean at the counter, a foot against a foot. Over years, that idle contact thins out, and the touch that remains starts to carry a question — is this going somewhere? Once every touch seems to mean “do you want sex,” the person with less desire in that moment starts avoiding all of it, just to avoid the question. Both people end up touch-starved, each reading the drought as rejection.

There is a physical layer under this, too. Human skin carries a special class of nerve fibres that respond specifically to slow, gentle, affectionate touch — the stroke of a hand, an unhurried hug — and route it to the parts of the brain that register safety and connection. That kind of contact nudges the body toward its calming chemistry and away from stress hormones. This is why a real hug can physically settle you, and why its long absence leaves a genuine hunger, not a mood. It also explains the study result: a spouse’s hand quiets the threat centres of the brain (Coan et al., 2006) because the body is built to be regulated by safe touch.

So the way back is not to manufacture desire, and not to wait until you feel like it. It is to separate touch from sex again — to let contact be allowed to mean only itself — and to reintroduce it in small, safe, daily doses (Debrot et al., 2013). One honest note belongs here. Touch starvation inside a marriage is common and workable, but it is not the whole map. If the distance comes with contempt, coldness that never thaws, or a partner unwilling to be close at all, that is a matter for a couples therapist, not a hug. And if the flatness is inside you — no pleasure in anything, most of the day, for two weeks or more — that can be depression and deserves a doctor’s care. Perukua is an artist and a facilitator, not a doctor or a therapist; what follows is a way to begin, alongside that support, not instead of it.

A Practice: Touch That Isn’t Going Anywhere

Here is a way to bring touch back that does not require you to want sex, or to have a big conversation you dread. It asks only for small, repeatable contact with no agenda — the very thing that went missing.

First, name it, and take sex off the table for now. Tell your partner the true thing: “I miss being close to you, and I’ve been avoiding touch because it felt like it always had to lead somewhere. Can we have touch that isn’t going anywhere?” Naming it out loud lifts the pressure that dried the touch up. You are not refusing intimacy; you are making room for it to return without a demand attached.

Second, build one small daily ritual of goal-free touch. Borrow Perukua’s: on waking, hands on your own body first — “hello, I love you” — then a real embrace with your partner, held long enough to soften, expecting nothing. In the evening, sit facing each other and breathe in the same slow rhythm for a minute, or simply hold hands while you talk. Thirty seconds of an unhurried hug is enough to start; the body reads slow, warm contact as safety. This gentle, unforcing return to the body is the ground of Perukua’s Open Your True Sensual Nature, which teaches sensuality as presence rather than performance.

Third, start with your own skin. Touch hunger is easier to meet halfway when you are already at home in your body. Lay a warm hand on your heart and one low on your belly for a few slow breaths; let a hand rest on the back of your own neck. It sounds small, but it re-teaches the nervous system that touch is safe and kind — so that when your partner reaches for you, there is a body ready to receive it, not one braced for a question.

In Closing

Being “touch starved in my own marriage” is one of the loneliest feelings there is, precisely because the person you long for is right there. But the story underneath it is more hopeful than it feels. The touch did not leave because the love did; it narrowed, and got loaded with a meaning that made it easier to avoid than to enjoy. Widen it back out. Let a hand be just a hand, a hug be just a hug — safe, slow, asking for nothing — and the body you thought had gone quiet begins to answer. As Perukua would say, feel your partner as a living being again, and start by coming home to your own skin. The hunger you feel is not a flaw. It is your body remembering how it was meant to be held.

This piece is general information about wellbeing, not medical or psychological advice, and Perukua is an artist and facilitator, not a doctor or therapist. Touch practices can support closeness; they do not replace care. If distance in your relationship comes with contempt or coldness that never thaws, consider a couples therapist. If empty or hopeless feelings last most of the day for two weeks or more, please reach out to a doctor — and if you ever have thoughts that life is not worth living, contact a local crisis line or emergency services. You do not have to carry it alone.

References & Quote Sources

Do you have any questions? Contact me now

Should you have any questions, please contact me via messengers below. I'll reply you shortly.

• Text me on Telegram
• Text me on WhatsApp